|
external resources |
||
|
> home > sustainability accounting > resources |
||
|
redefining progress
Redefining Progress Resources Excellent technical information on the ecological footprint is available from Redefining Progress. You are recommended to explore their website yourself. Here we list some of the most useful links: Ecological footprinting methods Four-page footprint brochure (in Adobe Acrobat format). [ back to the top ] Recommended Reading Sharing Nature's Interest: Ecological footprints as an indicator of sustainability www.ecologicalfootprint.com : Chambers, N., Simmons, C. & Wackernagel, M. (2000). Earthscan, London Island State: An Ecological Footprint Analysis of the Isle of Wight Best Foot Forward & Imperial College (2000) . Funded by Biffaward and supported by Isle of Wight Council, Best Foot Forward. Report City Limits London: A resource flow and ecological footprint analysis of Greater London www.citylimitslondon.com : Best Foot Forward (2002) . Funded by Biffaward and GLA The Footprint of Wales: A Report to the Welsh Assembly Government Best Foot Forward (2002) Ol-troed Cymru. Funded and published by WWF Cymru Footprint of Five Scottish Cities Best Foot Forward (2003) (part of Scottish Cities Review) Scottish Executive. Technical Report The use of Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity Analyses as Sustainability Indicators for Sub-national Geographical Areas: A Recommended Way Forward Lewan, L. & Simmons, C. (2001) Report and Annexes Two feet - Two Approaches: a component-based model of ecological footprinting Simmons, C., Lewis, K. and Barrett, J. (2000). Ecol Econ. 32 pp375-380 The Ecological Footprint for the municipality of Oslo – results and suggestions for use of ecological footprint as a sustainability indicator (Det økologiske fotavtrykk for Oslo kommune – resultater og forslag til anvendelse av økologisk fotavtrykk som styringsindikator) Aall, C., Norland, I. (2002) Report. Western Norway Research Insitute/ProSus. (English summary can be downloaded from www.vestforsk.no/publikasjonar.asp?gruppe=Miljøgruppa) An Ecological Footprint of Liverpool: Developing Sustainable Scenarios www.sei-y.org : Barrett, J. & Scott, A. (2001). Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden A Material Flow Analysis and Ecological Footprint of York www.sei-y.org : Barrett, J.; Vallack, H.; Jones, A. & Haq, G. (2002). Technical Report. Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden Eco-footprint analysis: merits and brickbats Rees W. (2000), Ecological Economics, Vol.32,No.3, pp3371-374 The Economics of Nature: Managing Biological Assets Van Kooten and Bulte (2000) Blackwell Publishers, Malden (MA) Living Planet Report 2002 www.panda.org/livingplanet/lpr02 : World-Wide Fund for Nature International, United Nations Environment Programme, World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Redefining Progress & Center for Sustainability Studies (2002). World-Wide Fund for Nature, Gland, Switzerland Our Ecological Footprint Wackernagel and Rees (1996) New Society Publications, CA National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept Wackernagel, M., Onisto, L., Bello, P., Callejas Linares, A., López Falfán, I., Méndez García, J., Suárez Guerrero, A. & Suárez Guerrero, G. (1999) Ecol.Econ. 29, pp375–390 Big things first: focusing on the scale imperative with the ecological footprint Wackernagel M., Silverstein J. (2000) , Ecological Economics, Vol.32, No.3, pp391-394 Strategic sustainable development – selection, design and synergies of applied tools Wackernagel et al., (2002), Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 10, Issue 3, June 2002, Pages 197-214 Humanity's Resource Demand Exceeds the Earth's Capacity Wackernagel, M., Schultz, N. B., Deumling, D., Callejas Linares, A., Jenkins, M., Kapos, V., Monfreda, C., Loh, J., Myers, N., Norgaard, R., Randers, J. (2002) PNAS 99(14) pp9266-9271 [ back to the top ]
|
||