Carbon Accounting
Ecological Footprinting
Sustainability Consultancy
Tools
Training
Business Case for Sustainability
Carbon Footprint
Ecological Footprint
Policy Context
News
In The Media
Partners
Publication
Clients and Case Studies
Contact Us
Staff
Our Story
Showing entries 31 to 40 of 84
BFF client Sheppard Robson has been awarded the "Most Sustainable Practice" award from Architecture Journal. The award is sponsored by another BFF client InterfaceFlor. In 2008 Sheppard Robson commissioned BFF to assess the carbon and ecological footprints of their annual office activities in London and Manchester. The results from the study have enabled them to develop a strategy to monitor and reduce their footprint in the future.
Sheppard Robson’s designated sustainability group, SR:Evolution, founded in 2000, currently numbers 14 people. They participate in project design at three stages: at the outset, to agree sustainability objectives with the client; during the design stage to prioritise a project’s social, economic and environmental aspects; and post-occupancy, to benchmark the building’s performance.
The practice has completed five BREEAM Excellent-rated buildings in the past year. Sheppard Robson was also a founding partner of SKA Rating, a recently launched environmental measurement tool for interior fit-outs, and participated in beta-testing for CarbonBuzz, the RIBA/CIBSE online tool for post-occupancy energy monitoring. The practice has measured its own carbon footprint since 2004
Having completed a carbon and ecological footprint study of a Worksop school for Balfour Beatty's Transform Schools initiative, BFF were recently invited to present the results to the student council and facilitate a student workshop on how to best reduce the school's footprint. After some fantastic discussions and ideas the Portland School students came up with a wide range of possible actions including introducing a vegetarian day in the canteen, emailing newsletters rather than printing, encouraging staff to car share one day per week and switching from bus travel to walking or cycling. We look forward to catching up with the students of Portland School in the future to see how their actions are making a change.
BFF Principal Consultant Simon Miller was invited to chair and present a session on footprinting at Sustainable Business - the Event, held a couple of weeks ago at the NEC, Birmingham. A video of the session is available here, but unfortunately the slides aren’t shown so some of his points lack the supporting visuals. However, it is a rare chance to see Simon in a suit and tie...
The spirit behind the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) legislation is laudable, but its introduction is baffling some UK organisations. The idea of legislation that not only puts a (low) price on carbon but also raises it to the board agenda through competitive public league tables is to be applauded. However, the piecemeal carbon legislative framework that we now have in the UK with the EU ETS, CCAs, and CCLs means the implementation of the new CRC risks causing additional confusion for environmental managers. As a result BFF is now advising more and more clients on CRC responsibilities, and on Thursday 4th June we are managing a high profile workshop covering practical examples of meeting CRC requirements, with extended reporting into a wider carbon management strategy. BFF has also developed our online carbon management tool called Footprinter™ to support CRC reporting.
Demand for BFF’s online footprint management system - Footprinter™ - is growing rapidly. As a result, we are now recruiting two people to join our Footprinter™ development team. Interested?
1. We are looking for a Business Manager to lead our partnership development work and marketing activities.
2. To bolster our techncial capabilities we are also looking to recruit a software Application Developer.
Details of both jobs are available here.
The basis of a good education, so they say, is the three R’s: reading, ‘riting and ‘rithmetic. A different set of R’s also crop up in the waste management hierarchy: reduce, reuse and recycle. We were reminded last week that if we are to conserve natural resources, and decarbonise our economy, the waste hierarchy also needs to be considered in the cold light of some robust ‘rithmetic. The occasion was a scientific media briefing to debunk some of the myths surrounding recycling which was organised by WRAP, the UK’s leading waste and resources programme.
BFF Technical Director Craig had been kindly invited to sit on a three person expert panel, alongside Robin Curry (SRI Research) and Liz Goodwin (WRAP’s CEO). They faced an assembled group of around twenty journalists who were keen to learn but, perhaps, expected more of a ‘rats in bins’ storyline.
With the judicious application of ‘rithmetic, Craig debunked the following three common myths about glass recycling:
1. Transport emissions for glass must be high because cullet is so heavy
2. Transporting unwanted cullet overseas negates the benefits of recycling
3. Driving to a bottle bank is pointless as the car produces more emissions than the recycling saves
We realized that whilst these were routine calculations for BFF to perform, there is a long way to go before the media, and general public, have the necessary ‘resource literacy’ to embed this balanced thinking in everyday living.
BFF has been invited to open and chair a session called ‘Cutting the Carbon’ at the Sustainable Business Conference. As part of the Sustainabilitylive! exhibition at the NEC Birmingham, BFF’s Simon Miller will be presenting and answering questions on footprint methodologies and applications. The session starts at 10.30 on Thursday 21st May, with more information available here.
The continued rise in popularity of product carbon footprinting has caught the attention of the 'traditional' Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) community. In the editorial of the latest edition of the International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment the editor of their new section on carbon footprinting makes some interesting points on the threats and opportunities this latest 'fashion' presents to the LCA community.
As the article rightly points out, the basic concepts behind carbon fooptprinting have been around for decades - but have just been called something different (i.e. "the result of the life cycle impact category indicator global warming potential"). However something about the carbon footprint - in combination with the rise of climate change as the number one environmental challenge - has brought this subset of life-cycle analysis to the masses.
BFF has applied the principles of LCA but not the popular models and software packages which often mask often unjustifiable assumptions. With the focus of some in the LCA community being on the ‘7th decimal place’ of accuracy, it tends to miss the point that if we are needing to cut carbon emissions of 80%, even the first decimal point is largely irrelevant.
The author correctly highlights many of the methodological issues that have dogged the development of carbon footprinting standards, such as PAS2050 (many of which have not been satisfactorily resolved) ... but he also admits that LCA practitioners might learn something from this new breed of life-cycle thinkers. In short, it could encourage a re-assessment of some of the fundamental assumptions which have become accepted and unchallenged.
As environmental accountants - but not 'traditional' LCA practitioners, BFF welcomes this dialogue between the two approaches and is certain that both groups can use their common aim - to capture life-cycle impacts - to strengthen both disciplines.
The article can be accessed via SpringerLink.
Defra has launched The Quality Assurance Scheme for Carbon Offsetting - an new initiative aimed at increasing consumers’ understanding of the role of offsetting in tackling climate change and helping them to make informed purchases of good-quality offsets.
From BFF's point-of-view, whilst offsetting should not be the primary contributor to a carbon reduction strategy, it can be part of the equation.
The Quality Mark can be used for offsets where it has been shown that they meet the specifications defined by the Scheme. In turn, individuals and businesses wishing to purchase offsets can use the Quality Mark to identify those offsets that meet key quality criteria and that provide the assurance that emissions are properly offset tonne-for-tonne. See the current list of approved offsetting organisations here.
From April 2010 around 5,000 businesses will need to comply with the ‘little known and complex’ (according to the FT) piece of legislation – the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC). It is a mandatory ‘cap-and-trade’ scheme which will apply to any business using more than 6,000 MWh of electricity. It means that businesses will have to carry out a ‘carbon footprint’ of their operations, buy enough ‘allowances’ to cover those emissions, then try to recoup a percentage of that cost by being placed high in the CRC emissions reductions league table. To encourage action, by year 5 of the scheme, the best performers will get back their allowance expenditure and a 50% bonus - while the worst will only get back half their money.
March 2009 saw the publication of the Draft Order for Implementation for consultation and the rather easier to read Draft User guide to the scheme. If you are one of the 5000 businesses, now is the time to start preparing. The User guide is at www.defra.gov.uk/carbonreduction and if you need some help finding your way around the scheme, give us a call.