Carbon Accounting
Ecological Footprinting
Sustainability Consultancy
Tools
Training
Business Case for Sustainability
Carbon Footprint
Ecological Footprint
Policy Context
News
In The Media
Partners
Publication
Clients and Case Studies
Contact Us
Staff
Our Story
Showing entries 91 to 100 of 100
There has been considerable interest in the work we completed for Radiohead to assess the carbon and ecological footprints of the band's tours in the US. Although the study was completed in 2007, journalists continue to contact us to discuss the study. You can hear BFF project manager Simon Miller contributing his thoughts on footprints and festivals on The World Tonight programme on Radio 4. Play audio:
BFF uses technology throughout the business to communicate its messages, so we have put a summary of our Carbon Footprint Masterclass online. The half hour taster from Simon Miller is (by his own admission) a little dry, but viewers may find it helpful to learn more about the course content. Visit Edie Live to view.
BFF has been recruiting again! Our newest employee is Charlotte Dickinson, who has joined us as a Project Manager. Charlotte previously worked for Ecofys, and before that spent 6 years at Thames Valley Energy (TVE). Charlotte brings in-depth expertise in renewable energy, and her strong analytical skills and management experience will be really valuable for our projects. Charlotte’s appointment brings BFF’s total staff to fifteen... and means we will soon need to take over the downstairs space in our office.
BFF has sent out its quarterly newsletter to contacts and subscribers. Our newsletter is intended to provide a quick update of what's changed within the company and a brief overview of some recent projects. The top stories this quarter are the website and logo redesign, new staff profiles and updates on projects for Radiohead, Ofcom and WRAP. If you missed the newsletter - or would like to sign up - you can view it on our website.
A critical step in carbon footprinting is defining appropriate boundaries which capture all activities relevant to a study’s objective. The same principle applies to national footprints where questions exist over who should be ‘responsible’ for emissions arising from the manufacture of goods for export, and how should these emissions be managed under international agreements?
This debate is best exemplified by examining China – a nation commonly cited as an ever-increasing producer of carbon dioxide emissions. A recent study by Carnegie Mellon University has estimated China’s “export goods emissions” contribute 33% of the country’s national footprint - a total of 1.7bn tonnes of CO2 (equivalent to the combined emissions of the UK, France and Germany).
BFF considers that ‘demand’ from consumers at an individual, corporate, or national level drives the ‘supply’ industries. The production needed to ‘supply’ goods leads to GHG emissions but the responsibility for the emissions sits with the consumer, i.e demand, side. Of course producers must maximise their efficiency of production, but this is something that can be driven in part by demand preferences of consumers.
BFF recognises the complexity of developing national footprint accounts from our own experience (and the enormous challenge of developing international agreements). However, the progress of carbon accounting rules and associated agreements must recognise these underlying behaviours if change is to occur.
A new report from The Ethical Corporation Institute has highlighted 'staggering inconsistencies' in the way FT 500 companies are calculating and reporting their GHG emissions to stakeholders.
Communications watchdog Ofcom is targeting a large reduction in the impact IT has on its carbon footprint. The steps are being taken after a carbon audit of Ofcom, conducted by Best Foot Forward, said the regulator needed to target cuts in IT. The news was picked up by Computer World.
In the world of environmental accounting there are a few debates that refuse to go away: comparisons between washing reusable nappies instead of disposing of them – or refilling glass bottles instead of recycling them. Similar questions have been posed over the efficiency of retreading old tyres instead of the manufacture of new ones.
The main arguments revolve around the efficiency of collecting old tyres and their subsequent performance profiles. At BFF we like to apply our accounting expertise to tackle such issues, so we welcomed a commission from the Centre for Remanufacturing and Reuse to compare the carbon footprint of a new and a retread 17.5-inch tyre for use by light commercial vehicles
The headline results show that the manufacture of a 17.5-inch new tyre produces 86.9 kg CO2 emissions compared to 60.5 kg CO2 for an equivalent retread tyre, a saving of 30 percent. The full report is available from the Centre, and has been picked up by US car industry publication Motor Age. In the article the Retread Manufacturers Association director David Wilson welcomes the results saying: “…an independent report has validated the retreading industry’s environmental credentials.” BFF will also be watching out for responses to our study from primary manufacturers.
The Managing Partners' Forum has launched a carbon footprint campaign. Part of this campaign includes the establishment of The MPF Register of Carbon Assessors, and BFF is one of the first companies to be listed. BFF were proposed by an independent organisation for inclusion in the Register because of our track record.
Ecover are a leading company in the field of sustainability and wished to conduct detailed ecological footprints of three of their leading products: washing powder, washing up liquid and toilet cleaner. Ecover appointed BFF to undertake both ecological and carbon footprints of the full product lifecycles including raw materials, manufacture and distribution.
We also provided a broader sustainability assessment, and together the results from these reports are being incorporated into Ecover’s constantly evolving sustainability strategy.